Scientists used AI despite conference review restrictions
Scientists reviewing papers for a conference were asked not to use artificial intelligence tools, but many reportedly used AI anyway. The supplied report does not identify the conference, explain how compliance was assessed, or provide a number for how many reviewers disregarded the request. It also does not specify which AI tools were used.
Scientists asked to review papers for a conference without using artificial intelligence tools reportedly used AI despite the request, according to New Scientist.
The supplied information does not identify the conference, say how many reviewers used AI, describe the tools involved, or explain how the use was detected.
THE QUESTIONS THIS EVENT LEAVES BEHIND
What incentives led reviewers to disregard the conference’s request?
How was compliance with the restriction assessed?
What consequences, if any, did reviewers face for using AI?
Were reviewers given an alternative way to manage the workload without AI tools?
How might undisclosed AI use affect confidence in the conference’s review process?
YOUR QUESTION
Does this story leave you with another question?
Send us the question the report did not answer. It may become the next question IAQ investigates.
GLOBAL CURIOSITY MAP · AUGUST 2026